Figure 1. Chemorheoglical properties of EMC (a) conversion vs temperature (b) viscosity vs temperature at constant shear rate (c) viscosity vs temperature at constant heating rate.
Figure 2. Geometrical model of TQFP 100L package (a) leadframe outline (b) computational grid
Figure 3. Predicted filling pattern (a) flood plot of melt front advancement (b) comparison of melt fronts in the center x-y planes on the top and bottom mold halves.
Figure 4. Geometrical model and lead frame layout of TSOP II 54L LOC
Figure 5. Predicted melt front advance melt at distinct time steps
Figure 6. Comparisons of simulated cross-flow phenomena and experimental cross flow at 1/3 shot